↓ Skip to main content

The cancer glycome: Carbohydrates as mediators of metastasis

Overview of attention for article published in Blood Reviews, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
3 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The cancer glycome: Carbohydrates as mediators of metastasis
Published in
Blood Reviews, January 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.blre.2015.01.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Siobhan V. Glavey, Daisy Huynh, Michaela R. Reagan, Salomon Manier, Michele Moschetta, Yawara Kawano, Aldo M. Roccaro, Irene M. Ghobrial, Lokesh Joshi, Michael E. O'Dwyer

Abstract

Glycosylation is a frequent post-translational modification which results in the addition of carbohydrate determinants, "glycans", to cell surface proteins and lipids. These glycan structures form the "glycome" and play an integral role in cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions through modulation of adhesion and cell trafficking. Glycosylation is increasingly recognized as a modulator of the malignant phenotype of cancer cells, where the interaction between cells and the tumor micro-environment is altered to facilitate processes such as drug resistance and metastasis. Changes in glycosylation of cell surface adhesion molecules such as selectin ligands, integrins and mucins have been implicated in the pathogenesis of several solid and hematological malignancies, often with prognostic implications. In this review we focus on the functional significance of alterations in cancer cell glycosylation, in terms of cell adhesion, trafficking and the metastatic cascade and provide insights into the prognostic and therapeutic implications of recent findings in this fast-evolving niche.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 158 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 24%
Researcher 22 14%
Student > Master 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 19 12%
Other 10 6%
Other 33 20%
Unknown 20 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 48 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 17%
Chemistry 20 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 27 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,778,730
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Blood Reviews
#300
of 685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,309
of 359,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood Reviews
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 685 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.