↓ Skip to main content

NK/T Cell Lymphoma: Updates in Therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
NK/T Cell Lymphoma: Updates in Therapy
Published in
Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11899-018-0430-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ritsuro Suzuki

Abstract

Extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma (ENKL), nasal type, is a highly aggressive lymphoma which used to show a poor clinical outcome. Expression of P-glycoprotein on lymphoma cells of ENKL is a major reason for the refractoriness to conventional chemotherapy containing anthracycline. However, recent innovative approaches have improved the outcome and prognosis of ENKL. The purpose of this review is to summarize the proceedings of treatment. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy containing platinum and several drugs including L-asparaginase, methotrexate, and alkylators shows excellent outcomes for the limited-stage ENKL. SMILE (steroid, methotrexate, ifosfamide, L-asparaginase, and etoposide) or other L-asparaginase-containing therapy is promising for advanced-stage ENKL, followed by either autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Anti-PD-1 or other immunological checkpoint inhibitors are recently reported to be effective for relapsed/refractory ENKL thought to be due to EBV-driven upregulation of PD-L1 expression. The prognosis of ENKL is therefore improving by the introduction of these strategies. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of limited stage was 63.2% [95% confidence interval (CI), 55.3 to 70.0%] before 2010, but was 79.4% (95% CI, 66.9 to 87.6%) in 2010 or after. However, there still exists a room for improvement, particularly for advanced-stage patients. The 2-year OS of advanced ENKL was 30.3% (95% CI, 19.5 to 41.7%) before 2010, but was 40.5% (95% CI, 24.8 to 55.8%) in 2010 or after. Optimal treatment scheme should further be explored.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 15%
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 10 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 21%
Physics and Astronomy 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 10 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2019.
All research outputs
#5,784,731
of 23,018,998 outputs
Outputs from Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports
#124
of 430 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,438
of 441,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,018,998 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 430 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.