↓ Skip to main content

Cimetidine reduces running-associated gastrointestinal bleeding

Overview of attention for article published in Digestive Diseases and Sciences, August 1990
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Cimetidine reduces running-associated gastrointestinal bleeding
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences, August 1990
DOI 10.1007/bf01537243
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert S. Baska, Frank M. Moses, Patricia A. Deuster

Abstract

A prospective observational study was undertaken to compare the effect of cimetidine usage immediately before and during a 100-mile running race on the frequency of detectable gastrointestinal bleeding and to relate these data to the frequency and intensity of gastrointestinal symptoms and to training data collected from pre- and postrace questionnaires. Nine of 25 runners in the 1989 Old Dominion 100-mile Endurance Race took 800 mg of cimetidine 1 hr before the start and at 50 miles. Sixteen other runners acted as controls and were not different in age, gender, or training data. All runners also submitted three stool specimens from the week before the race and from the first three bowel movements after the race on standard Hemoccult cards. All runners were Hemoccult negative before the race. One of the 9 (11%) cimetidine runners and 14 of the 16 (87.5%) control runners were Hemoccult positive afterwards (P less than or equal to 0.05). Nausea and vomiting were less in those runners taking cimetidine (P less than or equal to 0.05). There was no difference in the race performance as related to the ability to finish or in the number of miles run during the race. This study may help to define the etiology of this common gastrointestinal bleeding in these ultradistance runners and may be useful in preventing some of the symptoms associated with long-distance running.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 3 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 27%
Researcher 2 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 9%
Professor 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 45%
Sports and Recreations 3 27%
Materials Science 1 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 9%
Unknown 1 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2014.
All research outputs
#5,017,235
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#738
of 4,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,784
of 15,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 15,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them