↓ Skip to main content

De Novo terpenoid biosynthesis by the dendronotid nudibranch Melibe leonina

Overview of attention for article published in Chemoecology, November 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
De Novo terpenoid biosynthesis by the dendronotid nudibranch Melibe leonina
Published in
Chemoecology, November 2002
DOI 10.1007/pl00012669
Authors

Todd Barsby, Roger G. Linington, Raymond J. Andersen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 23%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 19%
Chemistry 3 10%
Environmental Science 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 7 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2021.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Chemoecology
#86
of 241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,442
of 52,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemoecology
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 241 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 52,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.