↓ Skip to main content

Lactoferrin

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, November 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users
patent
9 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
393 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
199 Mendeley
Title
Lactoferrin
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, November 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00018-005-5372-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

P. Valenti, G. Antonini

Abstract

The first function attributed to lactoferrin (Lf), an iron binding protein belonging to the non-immune natural defences, was antimicrobial activity that depended on its capacity to sequester iron. Iron-independent microbicidal activities, requiring direct interaction between this cationic protein and microbial surface components, were later demonstrated. Many other anti-microbial and anti-viral functions have since been ascribed to Lf. In mucosal secretions, iron and Lf modulate the motility and aggregation of pathogenic bacteria. Lf inhibits bacterial adhesion on abiotic surfaces through ionic binding to biomaterials, or specific binding to bacterial structures or both. Lf inhibition of bacterial adhesion to host cells requires Lf binding to bacteria and/or host cells. Lf hinders microbial internalization by binding to both glycosaminoglycans and bacterial proteins which can be degraded by Lf-mediated proteolysis. Moreover, Lf internalisation and localisation to the host cell nuclei could modulate bacterial entry into cells through gene regulation. Finally, the capability of Lf to exert antiviral activity, through its binding to host cells and/or viral particles, strengthens the idea that it is an important brick in the mucosal wall, effective against both microbial and viral attacks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 194 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 18%
Researcher 32 16%
Student > Master 25 13%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 9%
Other 27 14%
Unknown 44 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 4%
Other 32 16%
Unknown 50 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,767,796
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#197
of 5,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,800
of 78,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#2
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.