↓ Skip to main content

Small-scale coexistence of two mouse lemur species (Microcebus berthae and M. murinus) within a homogeneous competitive environment

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
Title
Small-scale coexistence of two mouse lemur species (Microcebus berthae and M. murinus) within a homogeneous competitive environment
Published in
Oecologia, June 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00442-008-1079-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melanie Dammhahn, Peter M. Kappeler

Abstract

Understanding the co-occurrence of ecologically similar species remains a puzzling issue in community ecology. The species-rich mouse lemurs (Microcebus spec.) are distributed over nearly all remaining forest areas of Madagascar with a high variability in species distribution patterns. Locally, many congeneric species pairs seem to co-occur, but only little detailed information on spatial patterns is available. Here, we present the results of an intensive capture-mark-recapture study of sympatric Microcebus berthae and M. murinus populations that revealed small-scale mutual spatial exclusion. Nearest neighbour analysis indicated a spatial aggregation in Microcebus murinus but not in M. berthae. Although the diet of both species differed in proportions of food categories, they used the same food sources and had high feeding niche overlap. Also, forest structure related to the spatial distribution of main food sources did not explain spatial segregation because parts used by each species exclusively did not differ in density of trees, dead wood and lianas. We propose that life history trade-offs that result in species aggregation and a relative increase in the strength of intra-specific over inter-specific competition best explain the observed pattern of co-occurrence of ecologically similar congeneric Microcebus species.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 3%
France 2 2%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 116 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 22%
Researcher 20 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 14%
Student > Master 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 17 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 69 53%
Environmental Science 28 22%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Mathematics 1 <1%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 20 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2021.
All research outputs
#7,438,092
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,669
of 4,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,562
of 82,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,207 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.