| Title |
The bioadhesive ofPhragmatopoma californica tubes: a silk-like cement containingL-DOPA
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Comparative Physiology B, May 1988
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00695330 |
| Authors |
Rebecca A. Jensen, Daniel E. Morse |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 56 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 33% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 19% |
| Researcher | 5 | 9% |
| Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 28% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 9% |
| Engineering | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 13 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2017.
All research outputs
#3,798,066
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology B
#70
of 814 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#800
of 12,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology B
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 814 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 12,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them