↓ Skip to main content

Necessary and sufficient conditions for collision-free hashing

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cryptology, March 1995
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Necessary and sufficient conditions for collision-free hashing
Published in
Journal of Cryptology, March 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf00190757
Authors

Alexander Russell

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 31%
Student > Master 3 23%
Other 2 15%
Student > Postgraduate 2 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 9 69%
Mathematics 1 8%
Engineering 1 8%
Design 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2017.
All research outputs
#7,452,489
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cryptology
#89
of 238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,470
of 24,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cryptology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 238 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 24,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.