| Title |
Optimally dense packings for fully asymptotic Coxeter tilings by horoballs of different types
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Monatshefte für Mathematik, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00605-012-0393-x |
| Authors |
Robert Thijs Kozma, Jenő Szirmai |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 1 | 33% |
| Other | 1 | 33% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematics | 1 | 33% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 33% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2016.
All research outputs
#7,452,489
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Monatshefte für Mathematik
#13
of 261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,374
of 155,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Monatshefte für Mathematik
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 261 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them