↓ Skip to main content

The Problem Is Not Professional Publishing, But the Publish-or-Perish Culture

Overview of attention for article published in Science and Engineering Ethics, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
The Problem Is Not Professional Publishing, But the Publish-or-Perish Culture
Published in
Science and Engineering Ethics, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11948-017-0015-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gonzalo Génova, José Luis de la Vara

Abstract

The publication of scientific papers has become increasingly problematic in the last decades. Even if we agree that a renewed model is needed for peer-reviewed scientific publication, we think the problem does not essentially lie in professional publishing-with economic incentives-but in the publish-or-perish culture that dominates the lives of researchers and academics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 12 19%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Librarian 4 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Other 16 26%
Unknown 12 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 13 21%
Social Sciences 8 13%
Computer Science 5 8%
Arts and Humanities 3 5%
Psychology 3 5%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 18 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2021.
All research outputs
#2,734,241
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Science and Engineering Ethics
#223
of 947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,666
of 447,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science and Engineering Ethics
#6
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.