↓ Skip to main content

Biological Therapies for Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Where Do We Stand?

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
Title
Biological Therapies for Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Where Do We Stand?
Published in
Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12016-018-8674-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emily Ko, Mirna Chehade

Abstract

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an immune-mediated, chronic esophageal disease characterized by esophageal symptoms and esophageal eosinophilia. It is triggered by foods and possibly by environmental allergens. Currently, there are no FDA-approved therapies for EoE. Commonly used treatments include dietary restrictions and topical corticosteroids. Many of these therapies are suboptimal in their efficacy, have side effects, or diminish patients' quality of life. Biologic therapies for EoE have therefore been sought as an alternative. The mechanism by which food allergens trigger EoE is thought to be a T helper type 2 (Th2) reaction, resulting in secretion of the cytokines IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13. IL-5 induces eosinophil production and trafficking to the esophagus, and IL-13 induces esophageal epithelial cells to secrete eotaxin-3, which drives eosinophil chemotaxis and activation. Mepolizumab and reslizumab, two anti-IL-5 antibodies, were studied in children and adults with EoE and resulted in reduction of esophageal tissue and blood eosinophils, but no significant reduction in symptoms. QAX576, an anti-IL-13 antibody, was studied in adults with EoE and showed a decrease in the esophageal eosinophil load and a trend towards clinical improvement. Since in situ IgE production was demonstrated in the EoE esophagus, omalizumab, an anti-IgE antibody, was studied in patients with EoE and not found to be overall beneficial. Furthermore, given the increased esophageal epithelial cell TNF-α expression in EoE, infliximab, an anti-TNF-α antibody, was studied in patients with EoE, with lack of success both clinically and histologically. In summary, although none of the biologicals studied so far in EoE have been highly effective, many demonstrated some histological benefit, especially those that targeted the Th2 axis. Therefore, the future for biologicals is promising as the pathophysiology of EoE is better understood, clinical assessment tools are validated, identification of patient subsets that respond best to biologicals is made, and dosages of biologicals are optimized.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 92 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 12 13%
Other 8 9%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Other 28 30%
Unknown 21 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Unspecified 4 4%
Arts and Humanities 3 3%
Other 20 22%
Unknown 21 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2018.
All research outputs
#18,810,041
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology
#566
of 690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#319,063
of 447,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology
#15
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.