| Title |
The ocean-going noni, or Indian Mulberry (Morinda citrifolia, Rubiaceae) and some of its “colorful” relatives
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Economic Botany, July 1992
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02866623 |
| Authors |
Julia F. Morton |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Unknown | 21 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 6% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 23 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2023.
All research outputs
#3,251,115
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Economic Botany
#94
of 844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,101
of 18,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Botany
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 844 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 18,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.