↓ Skip to main content

Tranexamic acid as a local hemostasis method after dental extraction in patients on warfarin: a randomized controlled clinical study

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Oral Investigations, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
Title
Tranexamic acid as a local hemostasis method after dental extraction in patients on warfarin: a randomized controlled clinical study
Published in
Clinical Oral Investigations, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00784-017-2327-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Salomão Israel Monteiro Lourenço Queiroz, Valeria Damasceno Silvestre, Renata Monteiro Soares, Giordano Bruno Paiva Campos, Adriano Rocha Germano, José Sandro Pereira da Silva

Abstract

The present work is a controlled, blinded, and randomized clinical trial comparing hemostatic measures for the control of post-tooth extraction hemorrhage in patients on anticoagulation therapy with warfarin. The sample consisted of 37 patients (37.8% male and 62.2% female) with a mean age of 45.5 years. After randomization, 20 patients were allocated to the control group (conventional hemostasis measures) and 17 to the study group (addition of local tranexamic acid). All variables that could influence the outcome were similar between the groups and no significant difference was seen (p > 0.05). In the assessment of immediate hemostasis, for the control group, the time to achieve cessation of bleeding was 9.1 (± 3.6) minutes. For the study group this was much lower, and this difference (6.018 / confidence interval of 95%, 4.677 to 7.359) was statistically significant (p < 0.001). In evaluating the control of intermediate hemorrhage, the use of tranexamic acid was more significantly associated with the absence of bleeding, especially in the first 24 h. Thus, this measure of local hemostasis in topical form with gauze compression and irrigation was shown to be more effective in reducing the time to attain immediate hemostasis, and in preventing intermediate hemorrhage.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 96 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Student > Postgraduate 10 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Student > Master 7 7%
Other 6 6%
Other 18 19%
Unknown 34 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 46%
Unspecified 4 4%
Chemistry 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 34 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2020.
All research outputs
#13,578,918
of 23,018,998 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Oral Investigations
#506
of 1,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,780
of 440,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Oral Investigations
#13
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,018,998 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,427 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.