| Title |
Somatotype analysis of elite Taekwondo athletes compared to non-athletes for sports health sciences
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Toxicology and Environmental Health Sciences, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13530-013-0178-1 |
| Authors |
Ji-Woong Noh, Ju-Hyun Kim, Junghwan Kim |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | 3% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 36 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
| Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 18% |
| Unknown | 13 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 14 | 37% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2019.
All research outputs
#7,544,865
of 23,018,998 outputs
Outputs from Toxicology and Environmental Health Sciences
#7
of 78 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,536
of 308,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Toxicology and Environmental Health Sciences
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,018,998 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 78 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,727 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them