↓ Skip to main content

Mycotoxins as harmful indoor air contaminants

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, November 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
157 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Mycotoxins as harmful indoor air contaminants
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, November 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00253-004-1753-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bruce B. Jarvis, J. David Miller

Abstract

Fungal metabolites (mycotoxins) that pose a health hazard to humans and animals have long been known to be associated with mold-contaminated food and feed. In recent times, concerns have been raised about exposures to mycotoxin-producing fungi in indoor environments, e.g., damp homes and buildings. The principal mycotoxins that contaminate food and feed (alfatoxins, fumonisins, ochratoxin A, deoxynivalenol, zearalenone) are rarely if ever found in indoor environments, but their toxicological properties provide an insight into the difficulties of assessing the health effects of related mycotoxins produced by indoor molds. Although the Penicillium and Aspergillus genera of fungi are major contaminants of both food and feed products and damp buildings, the particular species and hence the array of mycotoxins are quite different in these environments. The mycotoxins of these indoor species and less common mycotoxins from Stachybotrys and Chaetomium fungi are discussed in terms of their health effects and the need for relevant biomarkers and long-term chronic exposure studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Slovakia 1 <1%
Unknown 145 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 15%
Student > Master 18 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 9%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Other 32 21%
Unknown 25 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 9%
Environmental Science 14 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 7%
Chemistry 8 5%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 36 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2017.
All research outputs
#16,371,088
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#5,817
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,244
of 146,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#49
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.