↓ Skip to main content

Caste in the honey bee

Overview of attention for article published in Insectes Sociaux, March 1960
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Caste in the honey bee
Published in
Insectes Sociaux, March 1960
DOI 10.1007/bf02225754
Authors

Stanley E. Flanders

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ethiopia 1 7%
United States 1 7%
Germany 1 7%
Unknown 11 79%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 21%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Researcher 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 4 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 29%
Chemical Engineering 2 14%
Environmental Science 2 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Unknown 5 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2007.
All research outputs
#7,452,489
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Insectes Sociaux
#323
of 966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253
of 1,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insectes Sociaux
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 966 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 1,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them