↓ Skip to main content

Linking global warming to amphibian declines through its effects on female body condition and survivorship

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, September 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
261 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
451 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Linking global warming to amphibian declines through its effects on female body condition and survivorship
Published in
Oecologia, September 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00442-006-0558-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. J. Reading

Abstract

There is general consensus that climate change has contributed to the observed decline, and extinction, of many amphibian species throughout the world. However, the mechanisms of its effects remain unclear. A laboratory study in 1980-1981 in which temperate zone amphibians that were prevented from hibernating had decreased growth rates, matured at a smaller size and had increased mortality compared with those that hibernated suggested one possible mechanism. I used data from a field study of common toads (Bufo bufo) in the UK, between 1983 and 2005, to determine whether this also occurs in the field. The results demonstrated two pathways by which global warming may cause amphibian declines. First, there was a clear relationship between a decline in the body condition of female common toads and the occurrence of warmer than average years since 1983. This was paralleled by a decline in their annual survival rates with the relationship between these two declines being highly correlated. Second, there was a significant relationship between the occurrence of mild winters and a reduction in female body size, resulting in fewer eggs being laid annually. Climate warming can, therefore, act on wild temperate zone amphibians by deleteriously affecting their physiology, during and after hibernation, causing increased female mortality rates and decreased fecundity in survivors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 451 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 14 3%
Brazil 7 2%
Germany 4 <1%
France 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
Other 10 2%
Unknown 406 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 91 20%
Researcher 82 18%
Student > Master 57 13%
Student > Bachelor 52 12%
Other 33 7%
Other 85 19%
Unknown 51 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 269 60%
Environmental Science 89 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 2%
Social Sciences 6 1%
Other 12 3%
Unknown 57 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2023.
All research outputs
#3,116,111
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#596
of 4,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,067
of 67,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them