↓ Skip to main content

Neophobia affects choice of food-item size in group-foraging common ravens (Corvus corax)

Overview of attention for article published in acta ethologica, September 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Neophobia affects choice of food-item size in group-foraging common ravens (Corvus corax)
Published in
acta ethologica, September 2002
DOI 10.1007/s10211-002-0061-6
Authors

Maartje Kijne, Kurt Kotrschal

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 8%
Austria 1 2%
Unknown 54 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 20%
Researcher 10 17%
Student > Bachelor 10 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 17%
Other 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 58%
Psychology 6 10%
Environmental Science 5 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Philosophy 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 10 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2020.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from acta ethologica
#82
of 236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,023
of 48,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age from acta ethologica
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 48,922 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them