| Title |
Temperature calibration of differential scanning calorimeters
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, December 1995
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02547423 |
| Authors |
D. M. Price |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Ireland | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 94 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 26% |
| Researcher | 20 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 9 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 28 | 28% |
| Materials Science | 16 | 16% |
| Engineering | 16 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 18% |
| Unknown | 13 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2020.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry
#180
of 1,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,661
of 79,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,290 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.