↓ Skip to main content

Human Rabies: a 2016 Update

Overview of attention for article published in Current Infectious Disease Reports, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 530)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
Title
Human Rabies: a 2016 Update
Published in
Current Infectious Disease Reports, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11908-016-0540-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alan C. Jackson

Abstract

Rabies is a zoonotic disease that is usually transmitted to humans by animal bites. Dogs are the most important vector worldwide. There are encephalitic and paralytic forms of the disease. There are differences in the clinical features of the disease acquired from dogs and bats. Neuroimaging is non-specific. Confirmatory diagnostic laboratory tests for rabies include detection of neutralizing anti-rabies virus antibodies in serum or cerebrospinal fluid and rabies virus antigen or RNA in tissues or fluids. Rabies is preventable after recognized exposures with wound cleansing and administration of rabies vaccine and rabies immune globulin. Rabies is virtually always fatal after clinical disease develops, and there have only been rare survivors. The Milwaukee protocol, which includes therapeutic coma, has been shown to be ineffective and should no longer be used. The development of novel therapeutic approaches may depend on a better understanding of basic mechanisms underlying the disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,134 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 150 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 15%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Researcher 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Other 23 15%
Unknown 47 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 19%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 22 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 6%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 48 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 497. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2024.
All research outputs
#53,256
of 25,724,500 outputs
Outputs from Current Infectious Disease Reports
#1
of 530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,052
of 327,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Infectious Disease Reports
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,724,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them