↓ Skip to main content

Subarachnoid hemorrhage grading scales

Overview of attention for article published in Neurocritical Care, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
277 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Subarachnoid hemorrhage grading scales
Published in
Neurocritical Care, January 2005
DOI 10.1385/ncc:2:2:110
Pubmed ID
Authors

David S. Rosen, R. Loch MacDonald

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 207 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 13%
Student > Bachelor 25 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 10%
Other 21 10%
Student > Master 20 9%
Other 55 26%
Unknown 43 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 114 54%
Neuroscience 15 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Unspecified 5 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 2%
Other 16 8%
Unknown 54 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2016.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Neurocritical Care
#920
of 1,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,131
of 153,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurocritical Care
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.