↓ Skip to main content

Influence of green grass-based diets on growth and reproductive performance in dairy heifers

Overview of attention for article published in Tropical Animal Health and Production, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Influence of green grass-based diets on growth and reproductive performance in dairy heifers
Published in
Tropical Animal Health and Production, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11250-018-1514-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

M.R. Habib, M.H. Rashid, M.A. Islam, S. Majumder, K.M.S. Islam, S. Ahmed, M.S. Alam, E. Vargas-Bello-Pérez

Abstract

The objective of this study was to monitor the changes in growth, dry matter intake, and blood profiles (nutrition and reproductive hormones) of dairy heifers in response to green grass-based diets. Twelve crossbred heifers were equally divided into group 1: rice straw and concentrate; group 2: rice straw, green grass, and concentrate; group 3: green grass and concentrate; group 4: green grass, soybean hay, and concentrate. Dry matter intake in group 4 was found 6% higher (P < 0.05) than group 1. Negative body weight gain was found in group 1 and group 2 showed 14% higher body weight gain per 30 days compared to groups 3 and 4 (P < 0.05). Heifers in group 4 had significantly (P < 0.05) higher heart girth gain, serum albumin, urea, and blood urea nitrogen than the heifers in other groups. Endocrine parameters were found similar among groups. Overall, supply of green grass especially a mix of leguminous and non-leguminous was found advantageous in heifer feeding.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Lecturer 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 8 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 44%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 12%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Chemistry 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2018.
All research outputs
#15,682,052
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Tropical Animal Health and Production
#510
of 1,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#262,958
of 446,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tropical Animal Health and Production
#5
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,384 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.