↓ Skip to main content

Perioperative incidence of airway obstructive and hypoxemic events in patients with confirmed or suspected sleep apnea - a prospective, randomized pilot study comparing propofol/remifentanil and…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Anesthesiology, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Perioperative incidence of airway obstructive and hypoxemic events in patients with confirmed or suspected sleep apnea - a prospective, randomized pilot study comparing propofol/remifentanil and sevoflurane/remifentanil anesthesia
Published in
BMC Anesthesiology, January 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12871-018-0477-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philipp Fassbender, Silja Bürgener, Ali Haddad, Marie-Therese Silvanus, Jürgen Peters

Abstract

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a risk factor for perioperative complications but data on anesthesia regimen are scarce. In patients with established or strongly suspected OSA, we assessed in a prospective, randomized design the effects on nocturnal apnea-hypopnea-index (AHI) and oxygen saturation (SpO2) of propofol/remifentanil or sevoflurane/remifentanil based anesthesia. Patients were selected by a history for OSA and / or a positive STOP - questionnaire and received general anesthesia using remifentanil (12 μg/kg/h) combined either with propofol (4-6 mg/kg/h, n = 27) or sevoflurane (approx. 2.2 vol% endtidal, n = 27). AHI and SpO2 were measured during the nights before and after anesthesia. There were no differences in AHI between anesthetic regimens nor between the pre- and postoperative nights (propofol: 8.6 h- 1 (median, CI: 3.6-21.9) vs. 7.9 h- 1 (1.8-28.8); p = 0.97; sevoflurane: 3.8 h- 1 (1.8-7.3) vs. 2.9 h- 1 (1.2-9.5); p = 0.85). Postoperative minimum SpO2 (propofol: 80.7% ± 4.6, sevoflurane: 81.6 ± 4.6) did not differ from their respective preoperative baselines (propofol: 79.6% ± 6.5; p = 0.26, sevoflurane: 80.8% ± 5.2; p = 0.39). Even in patients with a preanesthetic AHI > 15, nocturnal AHI remained unchanged postoperatively. Thus, in a cohort of patients with suspected or confirmed OSA undergoing surgery of moderate duration and severity neither the volatile agent sevoflurane nor the intravenous anesthetic propofol altered nocturnal AHI or oxygen saturation, when combined with the short acting opioid remifentanil. German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00005824 retrospectively registered on 03/12/2014.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 15%
Researcher 7 13%
Other 6 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 19 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 23 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2018.
All research outputs
#13,226,544
of 23,018,998 outputs
Outputs from BMC Anesthesiology
#397
of 1,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,023
of 440,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Anesthesiology
#13
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,018,998 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,509 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.