↓ Skip to main content

Circadian photoreception in the retinally degenerate mouse (rd/rd)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Comparative Physiology A, July 1991
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents
wikipedia
16 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
430 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
253 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Circadian photoreception in the retinally degenerate mouse (rd/rd)
Published in
Journal of Comparative Physiology A, July 1991
DOI 10.1007/bf00198171
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. G. Foster, I. Provencio, D. Hudson, S. Fiske, W. De Grip, M. Menaker

Abstract

We have examined the effects of light on circadian locomotor rhythms in retinally degenerate mice (C57BL/6J mice homozygous for the rd allele: rd/rd). The sensitivity of circadian photoreception in these mice was determined by varying the irradiance of a 15 min light pulse (515 nm) given at circadian time 16 and measuring the magnitude of the phase shift of the locomotor rhythm. Experiments were performed on animals 80 days of age. Despite the loss of visual photoreceptors in the rd/rd retina, animals showed circadian responses to light that were indistinguishable from mice with normal retinas (rd/+ and +/+). While no photoreceptor outersegments were identified in the retina of rd/rd animals (80-100 days of age), we did identify a small number of perikarya that were immunoreactive for cone opsins, and even fewer cells that contained rod opsin. Using HPLC, we demonstrated the presence and photoisomerization of the rhodopsin chromophore 11-cis retinaldehyde. The rd/rd retinas contained about 2% of 11-cis retinaldehyde found in +/+ retinas. We have yet to determine whether the opsin immunoreactive perikarya or some other unidentified cell type mediate circadian light detection in the rd/rd retina.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 253 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 3%
United Kingdom 4 2%
Spain 2 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 234 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 24%
Student > Bachelor 41 16%
Student > Master 31 12%
Researcher 25 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 5%
Other 46 18%
Unknown 38 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 67 26%
Neuroscience 46 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 8%
Engineering 15 6%
Other 35 14%
Unknown 47 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2022.
All research outputs
#5,611,796
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#345
of 1,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,190
of 16,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 16,482 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them