↓ Skip to main content

GABAC receptors in the vertebrate retina

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Neurobiology, June 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
GABAC receptors in the vertebrate retina
Published in
Molecular Neurobiology, June 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf02755587
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter D. Lukasiewicz

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 57 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 27%
Researcher 10 17%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Professor 7 12%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 6 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 32%
Neuroscience 10 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 10 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2017.
All research outputs
#7,452,489
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Neurobiology
#1,346
of 3,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,296
of 27,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Neurobiology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 27,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them