↓ Skip to main content

Movement and memory: different cognitive strategies are used to search for resources with different natural distributions

Overview of attention for article published in Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
Movement and memory: different cognitive strategies are used to search for resources with different natural distributions
Published in
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, September 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00265-010-1063-4
Authors

Danielle Sulikowski, Darren Burke

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Netherlands 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Finland 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 77 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 33%
Researcher 15 18%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 56%
Environmental Science 7 8%
Psychology 6 7%
Computer Science 2 2%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 17 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2011.
All research outputs
#7,856,604
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#1,389
of 3,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,607
of 97,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#13
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.