↓ Skip to main content

“Girney” vocalizations among Japanese macaque females: Context and function

Overview of attention for article published in Primates, October 1985
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
“Girney” vocalizations among Japanese macaque females: Context and function
Published in
Primates, October 1985
DOI 10.1007/bf02382457
Authors

Ben G. Blount

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
Unknown 36 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 22%
Student > Master 8 22%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Other 8 22%
Unknown 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 46%
Psychology 4 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 5 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2019.
All research outputs
#7,544,865
of 23,018,998 outputs
Outputs from Primates
#471
of 1,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,781
of 10,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Primates
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,018,998 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,016 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 10,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.