↓ Skip to main content

Molecular evolution of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor: An example of multigene family in excitable cells

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Evolution, February 1995
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
50 patents
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
355 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Molecular evolution of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor: An example of multigene family in excitable cells
Published in
Journal of Molecular Evolution, February 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf00167110
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicolas Le Novere, Jean-Pierre Changeux

Abstract

An extensive phylogenetic analysis of the nicotinic-acetylcholine-receptor subunit gene family has been performed by cladistic and phenetic methods. The conserved parts of amino acid sequences have been analyzed by CLUSTAL V and PHYLIP software. The structure of the genes was also taken in consideration. The results show that a first gene duplication may have occurred before the appearance of Bilateria. Three subfamilies then appeared: I--the neuronal alpha-bungarotoxin binding-site subunits (alpha 7, alpha 8); III--the neuronal nicotinic subunits (alpha 2-alpha 6, beta 2-beta 4), which also contain the muscle acetylcholine-binding subunit (alpha 1); and IV--the muscle non-alpha subunits (beta 1, gamma, delta, epsilon). The Insecta subunits (subfamily II) could be orthologous to family III and IV. Several tissular switches of expression from neuron to muscle and the converse can be inferred from the extant expression of subunits and the reconstructed trees. The diversification of the neuronal nicotinic subfamily begins in the stem lineage of chordates, the last duplications occurring shortly before the onset of the mammalian lineage. Such evolution parallels the increase in complexity of the cholinergic systems.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 3%
Norway 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 110 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 28%
Student > Master 20 17%
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 15 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 34%
Neuroscience 23 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 12%
Chemistry 7 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 6%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 20 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,406,966
of 23,509,253 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#148
of 1,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,402
of 77,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,509,253 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,466 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 77,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.