↓ Skip to main content

Lumbar spinal stenosis in the elderly: an overview

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, September 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
171 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
Title
Lumbar spinal stenosis in the elderly: an overview
Published in
European Spine Journal, September 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00586-003-0612-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marek Szpalski, Robert Gunzburg

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 141 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 22 16%
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Master 17 12%
Other 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Other 26 18%
Unknown 30 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Engineering 6 4%
Neuroscience 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 34 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2022.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#1,124
of 5,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,903
of 53,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,258 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,981 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.