| Title |
Inorganic Molten Salts as Solvents for Cellulose
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cellulose, September 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1025128028462 |
| Authors |
S. Fischer, H. Leipner, K. Thümmler, E. Brendler, J. Peters |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Poland | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 126 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 27% |
| Researcher | 20 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 8% |
| Professor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 29 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 42 | 32% |
| Engineering | 15 | 11% |
| Materials Science | 13 | 10% |
| Chemical Engineering | 11 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 34 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2015.
All research outputs
#5,559,757
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cellulose
#122
of 1,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,920
of 55,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellulose
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,220 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 55,315 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.