↓ Skip to main content

Deep tow studies of the Tamayo transform fault

Overview of attention for article published in Marine Geophysical Research, August 1979
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 236)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Deep tow studies of the Tamayo transform fault
Published in
Marine Geophysical Research, August 1979
DOI 10.1007/bf00286145
Authors

Ken C. MacDonald, Kim Kastens, F. N. Spiess, S. P. Miller

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 22%
Unknown 7 78%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 22%
Researcher 2 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Professor 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 78%
Environmental Science 1 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2018.
All research outputs
#7,544,865
of 23,018,998 outputs
Outputs from Marine Geophysical Research
#29
of 236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,442
of 6,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Geophysical Research
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,018,998 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 236 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 6,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them