↓ Skip to main content

DEBUNKING THE FALSE ALLEGATION OF “STATISTICAL ABUSE”: A REPLY TO SPIEGEL

Overview of attention for article published in Sexuality & Culture, June 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
DEBUNKING THE FALSE ALLEGATION OF “STATISTICAL ABUSE”: A REPLY TO SPIEGEL
Published in
Sexuality & Culture, June 2000
DOI 10.1007/s12119-000-1029-1
Authors

Bruce Rind, Robert Bauserman, Philip Tromovitch

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 17%
Professor 2 17%
Researcher 2 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 17%
Librarian 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 67%
Philosophy 1 8%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2012.
All research outputs
#7,452,489
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Sexuality & Culture
#245
of 582 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,478
of 39,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sexuality & Culture
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 582 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.