↓ Skip to main content

Expert consensus for the management of advanced or metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine and carcinoid tumors

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Expert consensus for the management of advanced or metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine and carcinoid tumors
Published in
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, December 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00280-014-2642-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Castellano, Enrique Grande, Juan Valle, Jaume Capdevila, Diane Reidy-Lagunes, Juan Manuel O’Connor, Eric Raymond

Abstract

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare tumors that have been increasing in incidence over the last 30 years with no significant changes in survival. As survival of patients with these tumors depends greatly on stage and histology, early diagnosis, classification and staging of tumors in patients in whom NETs are suspected are of great importance. Surgery, either with curative or palliative intent, is the mainstay of treatment for localized NETs. Therapeutic options for this disease almost invariably include somatostatin analogs to alleviate the symptoms of excessive hormone secretion. Other approaches for advanced disease may include hepatic artery embolization or ablation, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy and systemic chemotherapy. Recent advances regarding the signaling pathways involved in tumor development have allowed the development of novel targeted therapies. However, due to the lack of prognostic molecular markers to identify high-risk patients and the absence of a common pathogenesis in all patients, treatment selection is often empirical. There is therefore a need to establish a consensus for the treatment of this disease and to provide evidence-based clinical recommendations and algorithms to optimize and individualize the treatment and follow-up for these patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 3%
Unknown 37 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 18%
Student > Master 6 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 11%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 5 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 61%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 6 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2024.
All research outputs
#7,601,772
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
#664
of 2,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,568
of 364,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
#12
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,501 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,063 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.