↓ Skip to main content

The role of substance P in stress and anxiety responses

Overview of attention for article published in Amino Acids, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
247 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
The role of substance P in stress and anxiety responses
Published in
Amino Acids, July 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00726-006-0335-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. Ebner, N. Singewald

Abstract

Substance P (SP) is one of the most abundant peptides in the central nervous system and has been implicated in a variety of physiological and pathophysiological processes including stress regulation, as well as affective and anxiety-related behaviour. Consistent with these functions, SP and its preferred neurokinin 1 (NK1) receptor has been found within brain areas known to be involved in the regulation of stress and anxiety responses. Aversive and stressful stimuli have been shown repeatedly to change SP brain tissue content, as well as NK1 receptor binding. More recently it has been demonstrated that emotional stressors increase SP efflux in specific limbic structures such as amygdala and septum and that the magnitude of this effect depends on the severity of the stressor. Depending on the brain area, an increase in intracerebral SP concentration (mimicked by SP microinjection) produces mainly anxiogenic-like responses in various behavioural tasks. Based on findings that SP transmission is stimulated under stressful or anxiety-provoking situations it was hypothesised that blockade of NK1 receptors may attenuate stress responses and exert anxiolytic-like effects. Preclinical and clinical studies have found evidence in favour of such an assumption. The status of this research is reviewed here.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 152 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 18%
Student > Master 16 10%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 30 19%
Unknown 27 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 28 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 8%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 31 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2023.
All research outputs
#3,324,944
of 23,505,669 outputs
Outputs from Amino Acids
#183
of 1,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,205
of 66,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Amino Acids
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,505,669 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.