↓ Skip to main content

Fiends, friends and fools: screen images and/as rural struggle

Overview of attention for article published in Dialectical Anthropology, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Fiends, friends and fools: screen images and/as rural struggle
Published in
Dialectical Anthropology, November 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10624-009-9125-6
Authors

Tom Brass

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 14%
Unknown 6 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 14%
Lecturer 1 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Professor 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 29%
Arts and Humanities 1 14%
Sports and Recreations 1 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2010.
All research outputs
#7,452,489
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Dialectical Anthropology
#66
of 209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,124
of 94,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dialectical Anthropology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 209 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them