↓ Skip to main content

Gastropexy and “Fundoplication” in surgical treatment of hiatal hernia

Overview of attention for article published in Digestive Diseases and Sciences, October 1961
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
294 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Gastropexy and “Fundoplication” in surgical treatment of hiatal hernia
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences, October 1961
DOI 10.1007/bf02231426
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. Nissen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
United States 1 4%
Unknown 26 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 5 18%
Researcher 5 18%
Student > Master 4 14%
Other 2 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 8 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 39%
Unspecified 5 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Unknown 10 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2023.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#1,546
of 4,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#247
of 1,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 1,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them