↓ Skip to main content

A revision of Dasyrhynchus Pintner (Cestoda: Trypanorhyncha), parasitic in elasmobranch and teleost fishes

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Parasitology, February 1993
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
19 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
A revision of Dasyrhynchus Pintner (Cestoda: Trypanorhyncha), parasitic in elasmobranch and teleost fishes
Published in
Systematic Parasitology, February 1993
DOI 10.1007/bf00009597
Authors

I. Beveridge, R. A. Campbell

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 1 14%
Unknown 6 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 43%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 29%
Researcher 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 86%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2020.
All research outputs
#7,452,489
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Parasitology
#149
of 732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,102
of 65,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Parasitology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 732 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them