↓ Skip to main content

Daily torpor and energetics in a tropical mammal, the northern blossom-bat Macroglossus minimus (Megachiroptera)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Comparative Physiology B, April 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
Title
Daily torpor and energetics in a tropical mammal, the northern blossom-bat Macroglossus minimus (Megachiroptera)
Published in
Journal of Comparative Physiology B, April 1998
DOI 10.1007/s003600050141
Pubmed ID
Authors

W. Bartels, B. S. Law, F. Geiser

Abstract

Little is known about torpor in the tropics or torpor in megachiropteran species. We investigated thermoregulation, energetics and patterns of torpor in the northern blossom-bat Macroglossus minimus (16 g) to test whether physiological variables may explain why its range is limited to tropical regions. Normothermic bats showed a large variation in body temperature (Tb) (33 to 37 degrees C) over a wide range of ambient temperatures (Tas) and a relatively low basal metabolic rate (1.29 ml O2 g-1 h-1). Bats entered torpor frequently in the laboratory at Tas between 14 and 25 degrees C. Entry into torpor always occurred when lights were switched on in the morning, independent of Ta. MRs during torpor were reduced to about 20-40% of normothermic bats and Tbs were regulated at a minimum of 23.1 +/- 1.4 degrees C. The duration of torpor bouts increased with decreasing Ta in non-thermoregulating bats, but generally terminated after 8 h in thermoregulating torpid bats. Both the mean minimum Tb and MR of torpid M. minimus were higher than that predicted for a 16-g daily heterotherm and the Tb was also about 5 degrees C higher than that of the common blossom-bat Syconycteris australis, which has a more subtropical distribution. These observations suggest that variables associated with torpor are affected by Ta and that the restriction to tropical areas in M. minimus to some extent may be due to their ability to enter only very shallow daily torpor.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
Mexico 2 2%
Brazil 2 2%
Colombia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 101 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 19%
Student > Master 20 17%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 7 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 87 76%
Environmental Science 17 15%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 <1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 6 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology B
#237
of 814 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,370
of 32,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology B
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 814 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 32,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.