↓ Skip to main content

Inbreeding and runs of homozygosity before and after genomic selection in North American Holstein cattle

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
130 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
Title
Inbreeding and runs of homozygosity before and after genomic selection in North American Holstein cattle
Published in
BMC Genomics, January 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12864-018-4453-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mehrnush Forutan, Saeid Ansari Mahyari, Christine Baes, Nina Melzer, Flavio Schramm Schenkel, Mehdi Sargolzaei

Abstract

While autozygosity as a consequence of selection is well understood, there is limited information on the ability of different methods to measure true inbreeding. In the present study, a gene dropping simulation was performed and inbreeding estimates based on runs of homozygosity (ROH), pedigree, and the genomic relationship matrix were compared to true inbreeding. Inbreeding based on ROH was estimated using SNP1101, PLINK, and BCFtools software with different threshold parameters. The effects of different selection methods on ROH patterns were also compared. Furthermore, inbreeding coefficients were estimated in a sample of genotyped North American Holstein animals born from 1990 to 2016 using 50 k chip data and ROH patterns were assessed before and after genomic selection. Using ROH with a minimum window size of 20 to 50 using SNP1101 provided the closest estimates to true inbreeding in simulation study. Pedigree inbreeding tended to underestimate true inbreeding, and results for genomic inbreeding varied depending on assumptions about base allele frequencies. Using an ROH approach also made it possible to assess the effect of population structure and selection on distribution of runs of autozygosity across the genome. In the simulation, the longest individual ROH and the largest average length of ROH were observed when selection was based on best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP), whereas genomic selection showed the largest number of small ROH compared to BLUP estimated breeding values (BLUP-EBV). In North American Holsteins, the average number of ROH segments of 1 Mb or more per individual increased from 57 in 1990 to 82 in 2016. The rate of increase in the last 5 years was almost double that of previous 5 year periods. Genomic selection results in less autozygosity per generation, but more per year given the reduced generation interval. This study shows that existing software based on the measurement of ROH can accurately identify autozygosity across the genome, provided appropriate threshold parameters are used. Our results show how different selection strategies affect the distribution of ROH, and how the distribution of ROH has changed in the North American dairy cattle population over the last 25 years.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 177 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 16%
Researcher 21 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 45 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 67 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 17%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 11 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 2%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 60 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2023.
All research outputs
#6,493,896
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#2,424
of 11,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,426
of 454,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#53
of 205 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,367 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 205 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.