↓ Skip to main content

Sense and antisense RNA are not toxic in Drosophila models of C9orf72-associated ALS/FTD

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
23 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
Title
Sense and antisense RNA are not toxic in Drosophila models of C9orf72-associated ALS/FTD
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00401-017-1798-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas G. Moens, Sarah Mizielinska, Teresa Niccoli, Jamie S. Mitchell, Annora Thoeng, Charlotte E. Ridler, Sebastian Grönke, Jacqueline Esser, Amanda Heslegrave, Henrik Zetterberg, Linda Partridge, Adrian M. Isaacs

Abstract

A GGGGCC hexanucleotide repeat expansion in the C9orf72 gene is the most common genetic cause of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia. Neurodegeneration may occur via transcription of the repeats into inherently toxic repetitive sense and antisense RNA species, or via repeat-associated non-ATG initiated translation (RANT) of sense and antisense RNA into toxic dipeptide repeat proteins. We have previously demonstrated that regular interspersion of repeat RNA with stop codons prevents RANT (RNA-only models), allowing us to study the role of repeat RNA in isolation. Here we have created novel RNA-only Drosophila models, including the first models of antisense repeat toxicity, and flies expressing extremely large repeats, within the range observed in patients. We generated flies expressing ~ 100 repeat sense or antisense RNA either as part of a processed polyadenylated transcript or intronic sequence. We additionally created Drosophila expressing > 1000 RNA-only repeats in the sense direction. When expressed in adult Drosophila neurons polyadenylated repeat RNA is largely cytoplasmic in localisation, whilst intronic repeat RNA forms intranuclear RNA foci, as does > 1000 repeat RNA, thus allowing us to investigate both nuclear and cytoplasmic RNA toxicity. We confirmed that these RNA foci are capable of sequestering endogenous Drosophila RNA-binding proteins, and that the production of dipeptide proteins (poly-glycine-proline, and poly-glycine-arginine) is suppressed in our models. We find that neither cytoplasmic nor nuclear sense or antisense RNA are toxic when expressed in adult Drosophila neurons, suggesting they have a limited role in disease pathogenesis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 129 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 30%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Student > Master 15 12%
Researcher 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 33 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 23%
Neuroscience 29 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 38 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,955,070
of 24,643,522 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#437
of 2,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,697
of 451,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#14
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,643,522 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,502 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.