↓ Skip to main content

Magnesium transport and function in plants: the tip of the iceberg

Overview of attention for article published in BioMetals, September 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
491 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
342 Mendeley
Title
Magnesium transport and function in plants: the tip of the iceberg
Published in
BioMetals, September 2002
DOI 10.1023/a:1016091118585
Pubmed ID
Authors

Orit Shaul

Abstract

The maintenance of Mg2+ homeostasis in the plant is essential for viability. This review describes Mg2+ functions and balancing in plants, with special focus on the existing knowledge of the involved transport mechanisms. Mg2+ is essential for the function of many cellular enzymes and for the aggregation of ribosomes. Mg2+ concentrations also modulate ionic currents across the chloroplast and the vacuolar membranes, and might thus regulate ion balance in the cell and stomatal opening. The significance of Mg2+ homeostasis has been particularly established with regard to Mg2+'s role in photosynthesis. Mg2+ is the central atom of the chlorophyll molecule, and fluctuations in its levels in the chloroplast regulate the activity of key photosynthetic enzymes. Relatively little is known of the proteins mediating Mg2+ uptake and transport in plants. The plant vacuole seem to play a key role in Mg2+ homeostasis in plant cells. Physiological and molecular evidence indicate that Mg2+ entry to the vacuole is mediated by Mg2+/H+ exchangers. The Arabidopsis vacuolar Mg2+/H+ exchanger, AtMHX, is highly transcribed at the vascular tissue, apparently most abundantly at the xylem parenchyma. Inclusion of Mg2+ ions into the vacuoles of this tissue may determine their partitioning between the various plant organs. Impacts of Mg2+ imbalance are described with respect for both plant physiology and for its nutritional value to animal and human.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 342 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 330 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 60 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 17%
Student > Master 49 14%
Student > Bachelor 45 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 6%
Other 38 11%
Unknown 72 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 153 45%
Environmental Science 31 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 7%
Chemistry 11 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 3%
Other 26 8%
Unknown 87 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BioMetals
#191
of 702 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,023
of 48,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMetals
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 702 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 48,922 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.