↓ Skip to main content

Long-term outcomes of children with end-stage renal disease

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Nephrology, April 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
Title
Long-term outcomes of children with end-stage renal disease
Published in
Pediatric Nephrology, April 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00467-005-1878-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. W. Groothoff

Abstract

Long-term survival of children with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has increased in the last 20 years, but the mortality rate remains high. Cardiovascular disease accounts for 40 to 50% of all deaths, infectious disease for about 20%. A prolonged period of dialysis versus having a renal graft and persistent hypertension are mortality risk factors. The prevalence of the various morbidities is high among those who have reached adulthood. Nearly 50% of all these patients suffer from left ventricular hypertrophy and life-threatening vascular changes; nearly one third has clinical signs of metabolic bone disease. This accounts for both dialysis and transplant recipients. The chance of getting cancer is increased ten times compared to the general population; skin cancer and non-Hodgkin lymphomas are most commonly reported. A long period of dialysis at childhood is associated with impairment of both cognitive and educational attainment. However, despite all these negative outcomes, the health perception of young adults with childhood onset ESRD is positive. Research and therapy in children with ESRD should focus not only on prevention of graft failure, but also on prevention of co-morbidity, especially cardiovascular disease, life-threatening infections and malignancies. Early transplantation, more extended forms of frequent hemodialysis in those who can not be transplanted, a more rigorous treatment of hypertension, avoidance or at least dosage reduction of calcium-containing phosphate binders, reduction of the chronic inflammatory state, and tailor made anti-rejection therapy after transplantation may all be targets to improve the outcome in future patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Researcher 9 12%
Other 7 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 16 22%
Unknown 14 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 62%
Psychology 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 14 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2020.
All research outputs
#4,695,422
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Nephrology
#771
of 3,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,288
of 58,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Nephrology
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,535 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.