↓ Skip to main content

Experience-dependent structural synaptic plasticity in the mammalian brain

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Neuroscience, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
patent
9 patents
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1571 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2238 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Experience-dependent structural synaptic plasticity in the mammalian brain
Published in
Nature Reviews Neuroscience, September 2009
DOI 10.1038/nrn2699
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anthony Holtmaat, Karel Svoboda

Abstract

Synaptic plasticity in adult neural circuits may involve the strengthening or weakening of existing synapses as well as structural plasticity, including synapse formation and elimination. Indeed, long-term in vivo imaging studies are beginning to reveal the structural dynamics of neocortical neurons in the normal and injured adult brain. Although the overall cell-specific morphology of axons and dendrites, as well as of a subpopulation of small synaptic structures, are remarkably stable, there is increasing evidence that experience-dependent plasticity of specific circuits in the somatosensory and visual cortex involves cell type-specific structural plasticity: some boutons and dendritic spines appear and disappear, accompanied by synapse formation and elimination, respectively. This Review focuses on recent evidence for such structural forms of synaptic plasticity in the mammalian cortex and outlines open questions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 31 1%
Germany 26 1%
Canada 10 <1%
United Kingdom 9 <1%
Japan 8 <1%
France 7 <1%
Switzerland 6 <1%
Italy 4 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
Other 32 1%
Unknown 2101 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 609 27%
Researcher 442 20%
Student > Master 261 12%
Student > Bachelor 196 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 103 5%
Other 362 16%
Unknown 265 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 770 34%
Neuroscience 525 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 152 7%
Psychology 143 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 96 4%
Other 236 11%
Unknown 316 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,081,799
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Neuroscience
#863
of 2,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,457
of 106,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Neuroscience
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,791 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.