↓ Skip to main content

Parallel Evolution of Nacre Building Gene Sets in Molluscs

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Biology and Evolution, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
232 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
215 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Parallel Evolution of Nacre Building Gene Sets in Molluscs
Published in
Molecular Biology and Evolution, November 2009
DOI 10.1093/molbev/msp278
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel J. Jackson, Carmel McDougall, Ben Woodcroft, Patrick Moase, Robert A. Rose, Michael Kube, Richard Reinhardt, Daniel S. Rokhsar, Caroline Montagnani, Caroline Joubert, David Piquemal, Bernard M. Degnan

Abstract

The capacity to biomineralize is closely linked to the rapid expansion of animal life during the early Cambrian, with many skeletonized phyla first appearing in the fossil record at this time. The appearance of disparate molluscan forms during this period leaves open the possibility that shells evolved independently and in parallel in at least some groups. To test this proposition and gain insight into the evolution of structural genes that contribute to shell fabrication, we compared genes expressed in nacre (mother-of-pearl) forming cells in the mantle of the bivalve Pinctada maxima and the gastropod Haliotis asinina. Despite both species having highly lustrous nacre, we find extensive differences in these expressed gene sets. Following the removal of housekeeping genes, less than 10% of all gene clusters are shared between these molluscs, with some being conserved biomineralization genes that are also found in deuterostomes. These differences extend to secreted proteins that may localize to the organic shell matrix, with less than 15% of this secretome being shared. Despite these differences, H. asinina and P. maxima both secrete proteins with repetitive low-complexity domains (RLCDs). Pinctada maxima RLCD proteins-for example, the shematrins-are predominated by silk/fibroin-like domains, which are absent from the H. asinina data set. Comparisons of shematrin genes across three species of Pinctada indicate that this gene family has undergone extensive divergent evolution within pearl oysters. We also detect fundamental bivalve-gastropod differences in extracellular matrix proteins involved in mollusc-shell formation. Pinctada maxima expresses a chitin synthase at high levels and several chitin deacetylation genes, whereas only one protein involved in chitin interactions is present in the H. asinina data set, suggesting that the organic matrix on which calcification proceeds differs fundamentally between these species. Large-scale differences in genes expressed in nacre-forming cells of Pinctada and Haliotis are compatible with the hypothesis that gastropod and bivalve nacre is the result of convergent evolution. The expression of novel biomineralizing RLCD proteins in each of these two molluscs and, interestingly, sea urchins suggests that the evolution of such structural proteins has occurred independently multiple times in the Metazoa.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 6 3%
France 3 1%
French Polynesia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 197 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 70 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 20%
Student > Master 24 11%
Professor 14 7%
Student > Bachelor 11 5%
Other 31 14%
Unknown 22 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 117 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 6%
Environmental Science 10 5%
Materials Science 8 4%
Other 15 7%
Unknown 30 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2022.
All research outputs
#4,499,159
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Biology and Evolution
#2,244
of 5,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,910
of 109,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Biology and Evolution
#11
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,307 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.