| Title |
Identifying habitat conservation priorities and gaps for migratory shorebirds and waterfowl in California
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-010-9943-5 |
| Authors |
Diana Stralberg, D. Richard Cameron, Mark D. Reynolds, Catherine M. Hickey, Kirk Klausmeyer, Sylvia M. Busby, Lynne E. Stenzel, W. David Shuford, Gary W. Page |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 5% |
| Italy | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 134 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 41 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 15% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 13% |
| Unknown | 15 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 71 | 47% |
| Environmental Science | 51 | 34% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2018.
All research outputs
#6,107,914
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#883
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,420
of 185,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.