| Title |
Technology generation to dissemination: lessons learned from the tef improvement project
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Euphytica, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10681-018-2115-5 |
| Authors |
Gina Cannarozzi, Solomon Chanyalew, Kebebew Assefa, Abate Bekele, Regula Blösch, Annett Weichert, Dominik Klauser, Sonia Plaza-Wüthrich, Korinna Esfeld, Moritz Jöst, Abiel Rindisbacher, Habte Jifar, Victoria Johnson-Chadwick, Ermias Abate, Wuyan Wang, Rizqah Kamies, Negussu Husein, Worku Kebede, Kidist Tolosa, Yazachew Genet, Kidu Gebremeskel, Brikti Ferede, Firew Mekbib, Federico Martinelli, Hans Christian Pedersen, Suhail Rafudeen, Shimelis Hussein, Muluneh Tamiru, Naomi Nakayama, Mike Robinson, Ian Barker, Samuel Zeeman, Zerihun Tadele |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Kenya | 2 | 50% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 88 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 3% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 28 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 36% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 30 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2022.
All research outputs
#3,203,526
of 23,460,553 outputs
Outputs from Euphytica
#82
of 1,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,359
of 443,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Euphytica
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,460,553 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,149 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them