↓ Skip to main content

Unhealthy Weight in Indian Families: The Role of the Family Environment in the Context of the Nutrition Transition

Overview of attention for article published in Population Research and Policy Review, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
Unhealthy Weight in Indian Families: The Role of the Family Environment in the Context of the Nutrition Transition
Published in
Population Research and Policy Review, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11113-017-9455-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ilana G. Raskind, Shailaja S. Patil, Regine Haardörfer, Solveig A. Cunningham

Abstract

India faces a dual burden of increasing obesity and persistent underweight as it experiences the nutrition transition-the dietary and lifestyle changes that accompany globalization, economic development, and technological change. Yet, the nutrition transition is not solely a top-down process; rather, global forces converge with local practices at multiple levels of the social ecology. The family environment, a key site for the transmission of local customs and norms, remains largely unexplored in India. We examined the extent to which opposite-gender siblings and mother-child pairs were concordant or discordant in body weight, and whether domains of the family environment, specifically, food practices, food-related gender norms, and household resources, were associated with patterns of unhealthy weight within and between families. Multilevel dyadic analysis and logistic regression were conducted using survey data from a representative sample of 400 families in a Southern Indian city. We identified substantial clustering of weight among opposite-gender sibling pairs (ICC=0.43) and mother-child pairs, as well as important patterns of discordance, including 11% of families experiencing a dual burden of underweight and overweight. Household resources, including mother's education and income, were salient in explaining the distribution of body weight within and between families. Importantly, less examined domains of the family environment were also relevant, including food practices (e.g. grocery shopping frequency), and food-related gender norms (e.g. mother's control of food served at home). Continued exploration of how global and local practices converge in households will be necessary to develop programming that effectively addresses India's dual burden of unhealthy weight.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 16%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 24 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 18 22%
Social Sciences 10 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 5%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 31 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2018.
All research outputs
#14,350,314
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Population Research and Policy Review
#481
of 662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,867
of 448,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Population Research and Policy Review
#9
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,498 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.