| Title |
The aging spine: new technologies and therapeutics for the osteoporotic spine
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Spine Journal, October 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00586-003-0636-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joseph M. Lane, Michael J. Gardner, Julie T. Lin, Marjolein C. van der Meulen, Elizabeth Myers |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Researcher | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 23% |
| Unknown | 11 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,684,170
of 23,381,576 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#1,032
of 4,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,129
of 52,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,381,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,759 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 52,686 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.