↓ Skip to main content

Quantification of Hemodynamic Wall Shear Stress in Patients with Bicuspid Aortic Valve Using Phase-Contrast MRI

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Biomedical Engineering, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
164 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
Title
Quantification of Hemodynamic Wall Shear Stress in Patients with Bicuspid Aortic Valve Using Phase-Contrast MRI
Published in
Annals of Biomedical Engineering, December 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10439-009-9854-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alex J. Barker, Craig Lanning, Robin Shandas

Abstract

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is often concomitant with aortic dilatation, aneurysm, and dissection. This valve lesion and its complications may affect positional and temporal wall shear stress (WSS), a parameter reported to regulate transcriptional events in vascular remodeling. Thus, this pilot study seeks to determine if the WSS in the ascending aorta (AAo) of BAV patients differs from control patients. Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC-MRI) was used to perform flow analysis at the level of the AAo in 15 BAV and 15 control patients. Measurement of the aorta dimensions, flow rates, regurgitant fraction (RF), flow reversal ratio (FRR), temporal and spatial WSS, and shear range indices (SRI) were performed. The BAV and control group showed a significant difference between the circumferentially averaged WSS (p=0.03) and positional WSS at systole (minimum p<0.001). Regressions found that SRI (r=0.77, p<0.001), RF (r=0.68, p<0.001), and WSS at systole (r=0.66, p<0.001) were correlated to AAo size. The spatial distribution and magnitude of systolic WSS in BAV patients (-6.7+/-4.3 dynes/cm2) differed significantly from control patients (-11.5+/-6.6 dynes/cm2, p=0.03). The SRI metric, a measure of shear symmetry along the lumen circumference, was also significantly different (p=0.006) and indicated a heterogenic pattern of dilatation in the BAV patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 4%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 123 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 24%
Researcher 23 17%
Student > Master 17 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 16 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 56 42%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Mathematics 4 3%
Computer Science 2 1%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 26 19%