You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Greater understanding of normal hip physical function may guide clinicians in providing targeted rehabilitation programmes
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, December 2012
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jsams.2012.11.887 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Joanne L. Kemp, Anthony G. Schache, Michael Makdissi, Kevin J. Sims, Kay M. Crossley |
Abstract |
This study investigated tests of hip muscle strength and functional performance. The specific objectives were to: (i) establish intra- and inter-rater reliability; (ii) compare differences between dominant and non-dominant limbs; (iii) compare agonist and antagonist muscle strength ratios; (iv) compare differences between genders; and (v) examine relationships between hip muscle strength, baseline measures and functional performance. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 2 | 29% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
United States | 1 | 14% |
Italy | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 4 | 57% |
Members of the public | 2 | 29% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 113 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 23 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 18 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 13% |
Other | 11 | 10% |
Researcher | 9 | 8% |
Other | 20 | 17% |
Unknown | 19 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 24% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 23% |
Sports and Recreations | 20 | 17% |
Psychology | 3 | 3% |
Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 7% |
Unknown | 27 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2020.
All research outputs
#7,960,512
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
#1,502
of 2,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,621
of 288,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
#14
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,874 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.